Whatcom County MRC Projects -
Whatcom County Clam Surveys

During the summers of 2004 and 2005 over eighty volunteers joined us on the tideflats to survey clams. The volunteers found at least ten different kinds of clams in various shapes and sizes.

*photo - Surveyors at Semiahmoo Spit

 

WHY SURVEY CLAMS?

Map of clam surveysIn many Whatcom County shoreline areas, native clams may serve as indicator species and help us gain an understanding of the health of the shellfish resource, water quality impacts, and harvesting impacts. The goals of this project are to gain a greater understanding of the populations of native and introduced shellfish in Whatcom County and to involve members of the community in protecting their shellfish. In 2004, clam surveys were conducted in Birch Bay, Drayton Harbor/Semiahmoo Spit, and northern Chuckanut Bay (Mud Bay). In 2005, surveys were conducted at Marine Park, Point Whitehorn/Cherry Point and Birch Point.

Birch Bay is one of the largest recreational shellfish harvesting areas in Whatcom County. Birch Bay is currently on the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) shellfish area watch list as "threatened". A threatened status indicates that the DOH has noticed a downward trend in water quality at least one of their regular sampling sites in the bay.

Jerry & SharonDrayton Harbor/ Semiahmoo Spit has also historically provided tribal, commercial, and recreational shellfish harvesting opportunities. Portions of Drayton Harbor were closed to shellfish harvesting due to poor water quality in 1995. In 1999, the entire harbor was closed. Efforts to improve water quality have been underway for several years and levels of fecal coliform bacteria have been decreasing in many areas of the watershed and harbor. Due to these efforts and improvements in water quality, in 2004 a portion of Drayton Harbor was upgraded to a conditionally approved status. See also Drayton Harbor Shellfish Protection District.

Areas of Chuckanut Bay were closed to shellfish harvest in 1994 after tests showed high counts of fecal coliform bacteria. Improvements have been made to protect water quality, such as surveying and upgrading septic systems, but there is still more work to be done to protect water quality and the shellfish resources.

*photo - Surveying Mud Bay

 

SURVEY SPECIFICS

Transect MarkerThe clam surveys were conducted along multiple transects, lines running from the shoreline to the water’s edge at low tide. Volunteers dug sample holes every 40 or 100 feet along each transect. The substrate (mud, sand, gravel, and cobble) was sorted to find the clams living in each hole. The clams were sorted by type and size, counted, and then returned to the survey hole.

The methods for this survey were based upon Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) protocols described in Procedures to determine intertidal populations of Protothaca staminea, Tapes philippinarum, and Crassostrea gigas in Hood Canal and Puget Sound, Washington (1996). Some adaptations were made to accommodate the large survey size, to return the clams to the sample holes, and to use community volunteers. Minor adaptations were also made between surveys to improve our efficiency and accuracy in the field and to adjust to the size of the survey areas.

*photo - Transect marker

Field Data Sheet
King County Shellfish Key

2004 CLAM SURVEYS

Birch BayBirch Bay Survey

The Birch Bay clam survey was conducted on June 6th, 2004. Twenty-five people participated in the Birch Bay clam survey, with over half of the volunteers joining us from the Birch Bay Community. Twelve transects were surveyed with sample holes every 100 feet. There were a range of six to forty-nine holes per transect. The types of clams found in Birch Bay included varnish, manila, native littleneck, macoma, butter, eastern softshell, and horse clams.

*photo - Birch Bay Survey

Birch Bay Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

Semiahmoo SpitSemiahmoo Spit Survey

The Semiahmoo Spit clam survey was a coordinated effort of the MRC and Drayton Harbor Community Oyster Farm. It was conducted on July 16th and 17th, 2004. Twenty-four people participated in the Semiahmoo Spit clam survey. Our volunteers were diverse with some even coming from Michigan and Florida! Fourteen transects were surveyed with sample holes every forty feet. There were a range of two to forty-three holes per transect. The types of clams found along Semiahmoo Spit included varnish, manila, native littleneck, macoma, butter, eastern softshell, and horse clams.

*photo - Semiahmoo Spit

Semiahmoo Spit Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

Mud BayChuckanut Bay (Mud Bay) Survey

The Mud Bay clam survey was conducted on August 24th, 2004. Nine people participated in the Mud Bay clam survey which covered a much smaller area. Six transects were surveyed with sample holes every forty feet. There were a range of eleven to thirty holes per transect. The types of clams found in Mud Bay included varnish, manila, native littleneck, macoma, butter, eastern softshell, and horse clams.

*photo - Mud Bay

Chuckanut Bay Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

 

2005 CLAM SURVEYS

Marine Park

Clam Survey GroupThe Marine Park survey was conducted on May 26, 2005. Fourteen people participated in this survey. Thirteen transects with sample holes located every forty feet were surveyed. The transects at Marine Park were fairly short in comparison to other survey sites with the number of sample holes ranging from two to eight. The types of clams found at Marine Park included native littleneck, butter, horse, macoma, manila, eastern softshell, cockle, and varnish clams.

*photo - Learning about clams

Marine Park Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

 

Variety of ClamsBirch Point

The Birch Point survey was conducted on June 23, 2005. Seventeen people participated in this survey. Ten transects were surveyed with sample holes located every forty feet. The transects at Birch Point had a range of three to thirty-three sample holes. The types of clams found along Birch Point included native littleneck, macoma, butter, horse, manila, eastern softshell, cockle, and varnish clams.

*photo - Variety of clam sizes

Birch Point Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

PWCP VolunteerPoint Whitehorn/Cherry Point

The Point Whitehorn/Cherry Point survey was conducted on July 23, 2005. Twenty-eight people participated in this survey. Fourteen transects were surveyed with sample holes located every forty feet. The transects at this survey site had a range of two to eleven sample holes. The types of clams found along this stretch of shoreline included native littleneck, macoma, butter, varnish, horse, eastern softshell, cockle, and manila clams.

*photo - Survey Volunteer

Point Whitehorn/ Cherry Point Survey Fact Sheet
Survey Protocols
Survey Results

 

 

2006 CLAM SURVEYS

 

Marine Park Blaine

The Marine Park Blaine survey was conducted on June 24, 2006.  Fourteen people assisted with the survey covering 6 transects over the vast tideflat.  Clams were sampled every 100 feet along each transect and the amount of sample holes ranged from 8 to 38.  The surveyors found horse, varnish, manila, macoma, eastern softshell and few native littleneck, cockle and butter clams at this survey site.

*photo

Marine Park Blaine Survey Fact Sheet

Survey Protocols

Survey Results

 

Lummi Island

The clam survey on Lummi Island was conducted on July 10, 2006.  Fourteen people assisted with the survey  over 9 transects. Clams were sampled every 40 feet along each transect with sample holes ranging from 4 to 19 along the transects.  Clams found along the Lummi Island shoreline include horse, varnish, manila, native littleneck, macoma, cockle, butter, and eastern softshell.

*photo

Lummi Island Survey Fact Sheet

Survey Protocols

Survey Results

 

Point Roberts

The clam survey at Point Roberts was conducted on August 8, 2006.  Sixteen people assisted with the survey, which took place on two very different beaches in Point Roberts. At Maple Beach clams were sampled every 100 feet along three transects with 20 to 30 sample holes.  Surveyors found an astounding amount of varnish clams at this location, while a few manila, macoma, cockle, and eastern softshell clams were also found.  At Lighthouse Marine Park clams were sampled every 40 feet along 10  short transects which were evenly distributed  from the north to the south shoreline of the park.  Sample holes at Lighthouse Marine Park ranged from three to five per transect.  Types of clams found at this survey site include low numbers of horse, varnish, native littleneck, and butter clams.

*photo

Point Roberts Survey Fact Sheet

Survey Protocols

Survey Results

 

Group of volunteersNEXT STEPS

These surveys will provide baseline information about the types, numbers and sizes of clams found in Birch Bay, Semiahmoo Spit, Mud Bay, Marine Park, Birch Point, Point Whitehorn/Cherry Point, Marine Park Blaine, Lummi Island, and Point Roberts. While there is general data describing where shellfish are found in Whatcom County, there has been limited species-specific data available.

The Whatcom MRC will use the information generated through these surveys to:

  • Describe the clams that are found in Whatcom County to the community, local agencies, and visitors.
  • Work with the community to provide more information to residents and visitors about how to protect this valuable resource.
  • Help identify potential sites for clam enhancement.